Analysis of Marianne Moore’s “The Fish”
Marianne Moore’s poem “The
Fish” illustrates the multifaceted expanse that is the ocean itself, and takes
readers on a journey through her vision of the literal and figurative depths of
the sea. From diction and tone to rhythm and imagery, Moore combines several
literary elements to create a truly vivid image of life existing under the sea.
Furthermore, critics consider “The Fish” to be a cornerstone of Imagist poetry.
Upon further investigation of Amy Lowell’s listing of the Imagist Criteria, it
is clear that “The Fish” is truly a piece of modern imagist poetry.
At first glance, there are
many factors about the poem, “The Fish” that stands out to its readers. The
poem’s unique form, the repeating syllabic pattern, and the flowing rhyme
scheme are all distinctive parts of this poem. However, readers may consider
the poem’s title to be most noteworthy. Readers may have the impression that
the poem will delve into a depiction of a literal fish, based on the title of
the poem. However, there is no mention of the fish beyond the poem’s
introductory line, “The Fish / wade / through black jade”. It seems as though
this introductory mentioning of the fish serves to set the scene for the
remainder of the poem that beautifully details everything, besides the fish, that
resides under the water.
A striking portion of the
poem arrives at its end when Moore describes the sea as if it’s alive: “All /
external / marks of abuse are present on this / defiant edifice— / all the
physical features of // ac / cident—lack / of cornice, dynamite grooves, burns,
and / hatchet strokes, these things stand / out on it; the chasm-side is //
dead. / Repeated / evidence has proved that it can live / on what can not
revive / its youth.
It is unclear exactly what
Moore is referring to when she writes about “this defiant edifice”.
Nevertheless, it seems important to investigate this portion of the poem
further, to gain a deeper understanding of its context. One interpretation of
the word “edifice” is that the term refers to the sea, the actual water itself.
However, this explanation begins to break down when one considers that
“edifice” typically refers to a sort of building, or a man-made, physical
prominence. Another interpretation of this first stanza of the excerpt is that
“edifice” refers to the entire ecosystem at hand. Including the water, the
barnacles, and the crow-blue mussel shells, all referenced earlier in the poem.
One may not consider this “edifice” as man-made, in the sense that it was
constructed by human hands. However, one can consider it “man-made”, as a
result of the significance man has ascribed to it, making it a figurative
edifice, rather than a literal one. The “external marks of abuse”, the
“dynamite grooves” and “hatchet strokes”, then, can also be man-made, the
negative result of humans’ interaction with their environment.
To further study the
literary tools used in Moore’s poem, readers can analyze the effect sentence
structure has on the information being delivered to them. Throughout the poem
Moore writes in complete sentences of varying lengths. Typically, shorter
sentences are used to captivate the reader’s attention as well as to create
some level of tension in the piece. In contrast, longer sentences lend
themselves to the formation of vivid imagery. When reading the stanzas from the
excerpt above, it becomes clear that Moore uses both of these writing styles to
her advantage. The long sentences create a striking image of the “marks of
abuse” on the “defiant edifice”. This use of longer sentences is not specific to
this stanza of the poem but repeats itself throughout providing readers with
deeper images of the scene at hand. Moore also uses strategic line breaks, by
way of her unique poem form to evoke certain effects in the mind of the reader.
The varying quality of the
sentence structure mimics the duality of the waves of the ocean. The short
sentence break exemplifies the short nature of some waves that dissipate before
making it to the shore or even the short lifespan of those that do crash upon
the coast. On the other hand, the long sentences mark another defining feature
of the ocean, the movement of the waves that are both continuous and seemingly
infinite. This combination exposes readers to the duality of the ocean and may
provide an “ocean-like” effect when reading it.
According to Amy Lowell,
there is a short list of attributes, that all modern imagist poetry tends to
have in common. Marianne Moore’s poem, “The Fish”, seems to lend itself quite
well to each of these six tenets. One tenet that stands out is the second one
in which Lowell states that imagist poetry “create[s] new rhythms - as the
expression of new moods”. The manner in which Moore accomplishes this is
two-fold. First, the form of Moore’s poem is new, and unique to her writing, as
it mimics the actual shape of the waves as they approach the shore.
Additionally, the poems rhyme scheme melds into its structure, bolstering the meaning derived from it.
Word Count: 845
Hey! Your post is very well written and delves into many interesting points within the text. When you touched on the literary tools which Moore used to captivate and also lead the reader to conceptualize certain themes; I was juiced because now I will be more aware to pay attention to literary tools like ones used in this text. But also a critique is maybe structuring you analysis a bit smoother, but other then that I loved it.
ReplyDeleteBrenda,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your interpretation of “The Fish,” and I agree with much of your close reading. For me, the strongest aspect of your post is the carefully thought out analysis of each quotation. I especially enjoy how you play with the different possible meanings of the word “edifice” in your fourth paragraph. An aspect that I think you could work on to improve this post is the transition between paragraphs. Right now you have good insights, but they do not fit together into a cohesive unit, which runs the risk of making your post seem list-like. One way to fix this would be to find a way to relate your paragraphs to one another every time you change topics so that your writing flows more seamlessly and logically together.